No. 14-0193
Click for Official Page
Oral argument was held on September 22, 2015. The Court issued an opinion resolving the case on April 1, 2016. File Closed
Tracking 1 article about this case.
April 4, 2016
from InverseCondemnation.com
Justice Devine delivered the opinion of the Court.View Electronic Briefs | Oral Argument | Video PDF
Appellate District: | 14th Court of Appeals |
Outcome Below: | Affirmed |
COA Docket No.: | 14-12-00401-CV |
Opinion Author: | Honorable William J. Boyce |
Trial Court: | County Civil Court at Law No 3 |
County: | Harris |
Trial Judge: | Honorable Linda Kathryn Storey |
Trial Docket: | 839502 |
Date | Event | Outcome | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-05-13 | Mandate issued | ||
2016-04-01 | Opinion issued | Court of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court | |
2016-04-01 | Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of record | Issued | |
This case was awaiting the Court's decision after oral argument between November 4, 2015 and April 1, 2016. | |||
2015-11-04 | Post submission brief filed (Petitioner) | ||
2015-09-22 | Oral argument | ||
2015-09-14 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | ||
2015-08-26 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | ||
2015-08-04 | Motion to substitute disposed | Filing granted | |
2015-07-31 | Notice of Appearance | ||
2015-07-31 | Motion to Substitute filed | ||
2015-07-10 | Case set for oral argument | Case set for oral argument | |
2015-06-12 | Petition for Review granted | ||
2015-06-12 | Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted | |
This case was pending on merits briefs between April 20, 2015 and June 12, 2015. | |||
2015-04-20 | Reply Brief (Petitioner) | ||
2015-04-16 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted | |
2015-04-16 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | ||
2015-03-27 | Brief on the Merits (Respondent) | ||
2015-02-25 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted | |
2015-02-25 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | ||
2015-01-26 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted | |
2015-01-26 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | ||
2015-01-05 | Brief on the Merits (Petitioner) | ||
2014-12-16 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted | |
2014-12-16 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | ||
2014-11-24 | Case Record Filed | ||
2014-11-24 | Record Requested in Petition for Review | ||
2014-11-21 | Brief on the Merits Requested | ||
2014-10-06 | Reply to Response to Petition filed (Petitioner) | ||
2014-09-19 | Response to Petition (Respondent) | ||
2014-08-26 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposed | Filing granted | |
2014-08-26 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | ||
2014-07-28 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | ||
2014-07-28 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted | |
2014-06-27 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | ||
2014-05-27 | Case forwarded to Court | ||
2014-05-21 | Response Waiver filed | ||
2014-05-16 | Petition for Review (Petitioner) | ||
2014-05-01 | Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted | |
2014-05-01 | Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | ||
2014-03-28 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | ||
2014-03-28 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted | |
2014-03-17 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | ||
2014-03-17 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted | |
2014-03-17 | Phone call from Clerk's Office |
Party | Counsel | Role | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caffe Ribs, Inc. |
|
Petitioner | ||||||||||
The State of Texas |
|
Respondent |
Caffe Ribs had a piece of property with some environmental contamination, which it had been working toward remediating and was, it alleges, nearing completion. The State announced an intent to take the property for use in a highway project.
Caffe Ribs alleges that, after this announcement, it became impossible to obtain the last certificate from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality that it had completed the remediation, which was possibly just months away. The State's expert witness at trial testified that the environmental contamination would reduce the property value substantially, forcing a delay of up to eight years. This presence of environmental contamination became the central aspect driving the property's value.
Caffe Ribs argues that it should have been able to put on more evidence to show, value, including evidence showing that the State's announcement interfered with the remediation. Caffe Ribs also challenges the state's expert.